Assessment Design

Assessment

Listening, reading, grammar, speaking, and writing assessments I've designed from the ground up, each documented with explicit validity, reliability, and test-design reasoning — not just the test items themselves.

Listening · Advanced Low · Teacher edition with answer key

Listening Assessment — Note-Taking, Pronunciation, Comprehension & Grammar

A four-section, 50-minute listening assessment that treats listening as more than comprehension alone. Section I has students take guided notes from a short academic talk and answer from notes only, testing note-taking as a skill in its own right. Section II checks receptive pronunciation awareness — word-stress recognition and decoding connected speech ("gonna," "didja") into standard form. Section III is a conversation-based comprehension test (main idea, detail, inference, speaker attitude) with the same length-balanced answer choices used throughout my assessments. Section IV recycles the same conversation for a grammar-in-context cloze and error correction targeting passive voice, reported-speech backshift, and subject-verb agreement — so grammar is assessed as it actually appears in spoken discourse, not in isolation.

Time & point allocation
SectionFocusTimePoints
I. Note-TakingGuided outline + short answer15 min15
II. PronunciationWord stress, connected speech10 min10
III. Listening ComprehensionMain idea, detail, inference, attitude15 min15
IV. Grammar in ContextCloze passage + error correction10 min10
Total50 min50
Download assessment + answer key (PDF, 80 KB)

Reading · Intermediate Low

Reading Assessment — Intermediate Low

Four reading passages (two narrative, two expository) written for the Intermediate Low proficiency level, each followed by five comprehension questions covering main idea, detail, inference, organization, and vocabulary-in-context. Answer choices are held to a consistent length across options so length doesn't cue the correct answer, and distractors reflect plausible misreadings rather than clearly irrelevant choices.

Download assessment (PDF, 78 KB)

Grammar · Advanced Low · Teacher edition with answer key

Grammar Assessment — Present Perfect & Future Tense

Two parallel 40-minute test forms (A and B) targeting present perfect and future tense at Advanced Low, so the test can be re-administered (e.g., as pretest/posttest) without a practice effect. Each form moves from controlled recognition (multiple choice) to controlled production (fill-in-the-blank, error correction) to freer production (sentence transformation, guided writing).

Time & point allocation per form
PartFocusTimePoints
I. Multiple ChoiceRecognition (10 items)8 min10
II. Fill in the BlankControlled production (10 items)10 min10
III. Error CorrectionEditing (5 items)8 min5
IV. Sentence TransformationGuided production (5 items)8 min10
V. Guided WritingFree production (1 task)6 min10
Total40 min45
Download assessment + answer key (PDF, 116 KB)

Speaking & Writing · Language Assessment Task (LAT) portfolio

Speaking & Writing Language Assessment Tasks

A five-part assessment portfolio: a 12-item oral test and matching speaking rubric, a parallel writing test and rubric, and a Can-Do self- and peer-evaluation project. Items progress from Novice to Superior and sample varied task types — description, narration, opinion, problem resolution, and quote interpretation — using the GRASPS framework (Goal, Role, Audience, Situation, Product, Standards) for authentic, real-world relevance. Every item specifies exact preparation and response time, and every response is scored against the same analytic rubric with concrete, observable band descriptors to reduce rater disagreement.

Download assessment portfolio (PDF, 139 KB)

How I think about assessment design

Across all four of these projects I apply the same three principles: validity (does the item measure the construct it claims to?), reliability (would the same student get a consistent score across raters, forms, or occasions?), and test design (does item type and sequencing sample a broad, representative range of the skill, rather than one narrow slice of it?). This framework comes directly from my graduate coursework in language assessment and from the AI-integrated assessment work described on the Academic Research page.